Joseph Dwyer, University of New Hampshire – Lightning

joe_dwyer_lgThunderstorms are a summertime staple across the country.

Joseph Dwyer, professor of physics at the University of New Hampshire, explains scientists are still studying these storms to get a handle on how they actually work.

Joseph Dwyer received his PhD in physics from the University of Chicago in 1994, working on cosmic-ray astrophysics. He worked as a research scientist on gamma-ray astronomy and space physics at Columbia University and the University of Maryland before joining the faculty at Florida Tech in 2000. In 2002 he became interested in lightning physics and in 2003 helped establish that lightning emits bright bursts of x-rays. He has since made contributions to terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs), terrestrial electron beams (TEBs) in the inner magnetosphere, x-rays from laboratory sparks, and relativistic feedback discharges (aka dark lightning), helping establish the new field of high-energy atmospheric physics. Dwyer served as head of the Physics Department at Florida Tech before moving to the University of New Hampshire in 2014. He is now Professor and Peter T. Paul Chair in Space Sciences Space Science Center (EOS) and the Department of Physics at UNH.

Lightning

AM-favicon-pink

It’s no secret that lightning is dangerous. It strikes our planet millions of times each day, delivery tens of thousands of amps of electricity to whatever it hits.  Lightning is also something that we don’t understand as well as we should. To keep people and property safe, we really need to understand how lightning works.  And, as the world warms, it’s likely that there will be even more lightning.

Right now, physicists are trying to figure out how lightning gets started, how it moves, and why it strikes one thing and not the other. These are very basic questions on which we scientists are trying to get a better handle.

Ideally, the best place to be to learn about lightning is inside a thunderstorm…but making measurements there is really hard to do.  Thunderstorms are big, dangerous places that pilots usually try to avoid, but even if you do manage to get an instrument inside a storm, the instrument could easily trigger lightning long before the lightning would occur naturally.  In other words, just by being there, we affect the thing we are trying to measure.

It is also difficult to study lightning from the ground. Lightning is so unpredictable and it moves so fast that you never know where to set your camera or your instruments. It’s just not something that lends itself to taking the kind of detailed measurements you need.

I was aboard an aircraft and the pilots accidently went through the middle of a thunderstorm. We plummeted 3000 feet while violently rolling back and forth.  I thought that I was going to die. The whole event lasted just a couple of minutes, but we got a goldmine of data while inside that thunderstorm.

There have been quite a few exciting discoveries in recent decades that shattered the notion that the atmosphere is a boring place. The fact is, scientists are just beginning to understand some of the mysteries of our atmosphere—and there’s a new appreciation for the fascinating things to be discovered just above our heads.

Share

Comments

2 responses to “Joseph Dwyer, University of New Hampshire – Lightning”

  1. Last night my husband, our cat and I were listening to thunder and lightning. We kept hearing an intermittent weird static sound, cracking in the living room. When investigating we found it was coming from an old, not used burglar alarm speaker up by the ceiling. The strangest part was it would crackle simultaneously to the lighting flash and then the thunder would come later. It did this on every lighting flash we observed. The sound from the speaker was louder the closer the thunder was to follow. When the storm was farther away it still cracked but at a lower volume. No other speaker or equipment in the house made noise and we had not heard this before during storms. It was kind of eerie. This lasted for a while and again was consistent with the lighting flashes. Have you ever heard of this?
    Sincerely,
    Amy Schoonover
    Mesa AZ
    [email protected]

    1. to the address of Joseph Dwyer, professor of physics at the University of New Hampshire, himself.

      Dear professor Dwyer,
      Through reading NewScientist (the Netherlands), it came to me that you do lightning research. More precisely, the article was about the origin of lightning and the enigma around that topic.
      Now, I have a message that might sound a little peculiar: I happen to know, in person, a creature named ‘Weerlicht’ in Dutch. A little googling shows me that weerlicht is synonym to bliksem, which is the Dutch word for lightning, but yet … this creature is not a lightning, but rather: when she flies slow, she is a long-stretched horizontal stripe in the night sky. She shows herself as a cute white being with a voice, eyes et cetera. She i not the same creature as lightning, but I hear that she is acquainted to lightning, and she has shwon that to me by letting lightning make a slow ‘plasma’ movement very near to my window. The message was: The lightning controls herself by will. Thus, the origin of lightning must be will, and creation. My sweet sister weerlicht will visit you soon or has already arrived. Please listen to her and she might help you out on some big questions about lightning. I think I just saw her and her friend make that plasma movement near you, ever since we are chatting telepatically, better be informed. I also must say that possibly, when she explains her part in physisc to you, she will offer a contract concerning the legal part of the scientific coöperation. Thank you so much for reading (it is my hope that someone will show you) and Greetings from: [email protected] (permanently hacked e-mailaddress, I don’t have another one). I whish you all the best! (and I also must say that my ambitions are in science rather than in ‘movies’). Bye!