I am a landscape and conservation ecologist. My students and I study the effects of landscape structure on biodiversity and the abundance, distribution and persistence of wildlife populations. Study species include frogs and toads, turtles, birds, mammals, insects, other arthropods, plants and lichens. Landscape structure includes the amounts of various kinds of land cover in a landscape (e.g., forest, wetland, roads, crop fields), and the spatial arrangement of these cover types.
For the past 40 years, conservation biologists have argued that we should focus on preserving large in-tact blocks of natural habitats such as very large forested areas or very large wetlands. These areas are assumed to be most valuable for species conservation. For this reason, conservation policies and regulations around the world aim to find and protect significant large blocks of natural habitats.
The flip side is that small bits of habitat are generally ignored and often destroyed. Small bits of forest or hedgerows are removed and small wetlands are filled with little notice or concern.
But what is the cumulative effect of this habitat destruction on species conservation? Certainly a large block of natural habitat has more conservation value than a single small bit of natural habitat. But what if there are many small bits of habitat, which altogether equal the area of the one large block?
Surprisingly, in my recent review I found that usually there is no difference in conservation value between a single large block of natural habitat and a group of small bits of habitat that add up to the same area as the large block.
In fact, when there is a difference, usually the conservation value of the group of small bits is actually higher than the conservation value of the single large block.
This result is important for species conservation. It means that policies and regulations that focus only on large blocks of natural habitats and ignore the small bits of habitat may be falling short when it comes to achieving conservation objectives.
It means that all areas of natural habitat have conservation value no matter how small, and this should be reflected in conservation policies and regulations.